Monday, January 02, 2006

Texas Monthly Article OK but Needs some Hot Sauce

Roger S. - 07:32pm Dec 30, 2005 Central (#2 of 16)
HAPPY and SAFE NEW YEAR FROM Kenedy-Ranch.com the official Fernandez family web site and scrapbook!!! This site is the Fenandez family message center, and represents our family's independence from others who call themselves co-venture co-workers or employees. Anyone who disputes this is free to contact fernmr3@aol.com Posted at Caller.com on 12/ 30/ 05
Jaime Kenedeno - 08:16pm Dec 31, 2005 Central (#3 of 16)
Roger the scrap maker.
Fernandez is not your last name.
The official site is
http://www.kenedyranch.net
We know your mom put you up to it.
Tell the Fernandez' to pay their bills.
It is going to get RUFF.
Roger S. - 03:09am Jan 1, 2006 Central (#4 of 16)
Anton aka Jaime , and any of your real or fantasy co-workers you are banned from contact with the Fernandez family by e-mail, or other means and are banned from the one official Fernandez family central message web site Kenedy-Ranch.com please let me say to everybody else on behalf of my family thank you for all the e-mails we have received in 2005 and especially all the words of encouragement. Feliz ano nuevo from Kenedy-Ranch.com up-dates soon to follow posted on Caller.com 1/1/06
Jaime Kenedeno - 08:53pm Jan 1, 2006 Central (#5 of 16)
You cant ban me from that faux website. Somebody is RACKING up the DINERO.
I will email at my leisure if need be.
Ask Shamsie how he likes being guillotined for Ray Fernandez not keeping his committments. The beheading has begun for those who stuck their neck out for a dishonorable Medical Examiner and his lousy wifey.
Also, there aint nothin there at that Faux website.
To interact on the "Genuine Article" go to
http://www.kenedyranch.net
It has everything the Faux stole from us and much much more.
Roger S. - 12:31am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#6 of 16)
Kenedy-Ranch.com is the official Fernandez family member web site since it is the only way to contact them for some time now. No other web site has been in contact with them, and imposters are not welcome. Kenedy-ranch.com is non-faux and only non-fiction. Others may claim an employment, committment, or association and are in a fantasy world of government employee eg. medical examiner, Texas Ranger, police, F.B.I. cover-ups and are in dire need of help. These guys are the epitomes of Dee Dee Dees!!! Posted on Caller.com 1/2/06
Jaime Kenedeno - 01:28am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#7 of 16)
That is some stale Mantra you got for yuorself Rog.
Cant write anything else or too lazy.
Fix that faux website up like you promised everyone.
There you guys go again cant keep a committment, cant back up your smack and lame replies with the same lame propeller crap.
Write something new. Something dynamic surprise us.
LOL
Jaime Kenedeno - 01:29am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#8 of 16)
oh yeah do a google search on my intellectual property
kfatso
Then tell everyone I have done nothing for you louses.
Jaime Kenedeno - 01:59am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#9 of 16)
http://www.texasmonthly.com/textalk/article?sid=1826
Review: Texas Monthly Article OK but Needs some Hot Sauce Posted on September 2, 2004 at 05:21:59 AM by Jaime
First of all I must commend the Texas Monthly writer Gary Cartwright for the extensive research into the history and truth of the saga. He told the old story of Sarita, Brother Leo, Peter Grace, and remained mundane with the respect to the Vatican and Catholic Church.
I learned from his article of an encounter between Grandmother, Daughter in law, and Grand daughter / "illegitimate child". Although the age of Matilde is probably around 14 years old; Cartwright estimated her at 18 years old when the encounter occurred(1940). Marie Stella Turcotte Kenedy, Matilde's Paternal Grandmother (John G Kenedy Jr. & Sarita's Mother) is hospitalized at Spohn Hospital. Matilde was a volunteer working on the floor where Marie Stella was dying. At several different times she introduced Matilde to Johnny and Sarita. Then one day she introduced Matilde to Johnny's wife Elena Suess Kenedy. The article goes into the life of Maria Rowland. It describes how Ray Fernandez tracked down Maria's brother, Daniel Rowland and after considerable prompting confessed the family secret. He talks of a time when he and Tom Goates (a Corpus Christi Detective who was Maria's second husband) both knew that Matilde's father was John G Kenedy Jr. "But they never discussed it with other family members". Cartwright goes on to mention the sworn affidavit of Daniel Rowland. In the Affidavit Matilde's brother explained, " We were frightened of what the Kenedy family might do. We wanted to protect (Maria's) reputation.... South Texas was a much different place in the thirties and forties for working-class Mexican Americans. Those with money and large ranches made the rules." He recalled a day going with Goates to La Parra to ask for money from Johnny Kenedy. Daniel waited in the truck while Goates went into the house. Goates returne
Jaime Kenedeno - 02:00am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#10 of 16)
Continued Goates returned with a stuffed envelope. This in itself demonstrates the nature of Johnny to Maria and Matilde regarding the issue of inclusion in the Will. Johnny wanted to give to Matilde, the mother of his child as well as her husband Tom Goates. The article also conveys the shock and dis-belief Matilde and Ray exhibited upon discovery of the secret. Matilde was shown the video of her uncle's (Daniel Rowland) conversation with her son. Her confusion is tantamount to the fact that she never new Johnny was her biological father. She remembered first meeting Johnny at the hospital. She later recalled Johnny had brought her fruit baskets and dolls at Christmas time when she was much younger. Matilde also remembered sitting on Marie Stella's lap at the mansion and that Johnny's mother had once talked of sending her to a convent to be a Nun. The article allowed Ray Fernandez to explain his reasons for the litigation and the origins of a cause that has become much more than the land, oil uranium or riches involved. Although the article is redeeming and revealing; I must question why the author did not come out and rebuke the Vatican, the Catholic Church and KFATSO for thier audacious transgressions epitomizing the very oppression Tom Goates mentions. It is still going on. I also question Texas Monthly as to why Dr. Fernandez is not on the cover of the issue. His heritage has ascended to the Texas Supreme Court and will be front page worthy in the future. I guess they had thier chance? Also it concerns me that the article is placed in the middle of the magazine when it demands priority. It seems it was written to appease the Fernandez cause rather than exposing the true opposition. The author tiptoed the line and may have overstepped by telling us too much. I challenge him to do another article on the Fernandez cause, what and who it represents, and how the opposition to the cause is corrupt, oppressive and elitist. Tell us the "rest of the story" this time
Jaime Kenedeno - 03:57am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#11 of 16)
http://pub7.bravenet.com/forum/558086678/show/521255
A Mexican Heir is Blasphemy in South Texas
A Mexican Heir is Blasphemy in South Texas Posted on April 1, 2005 at 07:33:55 AM by Jaime
Colloquial Adaptation by Jaime Kenadeno
It is a new story and an old story. The fact that Power Rancher John G Kenedy Jr. engaged in the kind of "hybrid baby making" privately that his wife Elena Suess Kenedy denied publicly is not much of a surprise. After all, she excluded “illegitimates” in her will.
The media coverage around the recent announcement by Anita Matilde that “Johnny” was her biological father has danced rather timidly around some of the more affluent overclass in South Texas. There is no room for a Mexican heir. They are a “different breed of stock”.
Since the rape of non-white women by plantation owners and Southern Ranchers in antebellum days, white men have been able to reconcile their sexual encounters with non-white women with their support of anti-ethnic public policies. That is because discrimination has never been simply about separation of White and Non-White but about the subordination of one group to the will and interests of another.
The sexual exploitation of powerless non-white women by powerful white men was the corollary to the lynching and castration of black men and the murdering and imprisoning of Hispanic men. It was the norm.
Whatever the details, John G Kenedy Jr.’s sexual relationship with a hispanic teenage maid in South Texas in 1925 was a form of sexual exploitation. Was it an "affair," Ann Rowland; Anita Matilde’s mother displayed a love for “Johnny” who resembles her son Ray Fernandez. But, initially did Rowland have a consensual choice? Even though there is no evidence that Johnny intimidated or even threatened Anita Matilde’s mother, there is little chance she could have consented freely.
In 1925, most Non-Whites in the South were disenfranchised and utterly powerless. There were virtually no Hispani
Jaime Kenedeno - 03:58am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#12 of 16)
continued There were virtually no Hispanic judges, police or politicians, and Non-White citizens were treated as second-class in every respect, with little recourse.
The dictate of the 1857 Dred Scott Supreme Court decision that proclaimed, "black men have no rights that white men are bound to respect," although overturned by Reconstruction, was still very much in place. This applied to Hispanics in South Texas This applied to the women, as well. It was against this social and economic landscape that Ann Rowland entered into a sexual relationship with the young married Kenedy. He had all the power and privilege, and she was at his mercy.
Therefore, could Ann Rowland have said no to her employer'? Yes, in an absolute sense, perhaps she could have, but there would have been dire consequences. In small towns like Sarita, Kingsville and Corpus Christi, everyone knew everyone else. Hispanic servants were fired on a whim, and without a recommendation that she was trustworthy and compliant, who would have hired her? With no financial resources and no education, where would she have gone?
The sexual exploitation of Hispanic domestic workers, especially live-in maids was commonplace up until World War II, when the job market began to change. Until then, they were violated against their will routinely as almost a condition of employment. Ann Rowland, who lived a difficult life, was only one of many such women.
This was not a harmless boyhood antic or a benign "mistake," or something terribly at odds with his avowed marriage. This was an exploitation of a vulnerable Hispanic girl. It had more severe consequences for her life than for his. The baby was taken from her mother to prevent awkward embarrassment for the Kennedy’s, and the young mother lived out her days in shame and silence.
It is important to note that Rowland was only 18 when her child was born and probably 16 when the sexual encounters with “Johnny” began. She was a minor, under the age of consen
Jaime Kenedeno - 03:59am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#13 of 16)
continued She was a minor, under the age of consent in most states. Kenedy, who was ?? at the time, was an adult. While his actions speak to a larger pattern of sexual violation, they also seem to represent a case of statutory rape.
This reminds me of Ray Fernandez believing his Grandfather to be ///////// Fernandez and then his grandmother said to him he looks like Johnny. John Kenedy? You mean the president? That is when he questioned his roots. Naively Ray Fernandez asked ??????? ?????? is my Grandfather isnt he? "Not exactly," his mother replied with hesitation. "Your Grandmother was “taken” by a white man when she was 18, and that's what happened," she blurted out.
The white man was a prominent businessman in town. He provided financial support, I learned later. Remember Anita Matilde’s word: "taken."
Something had happened to Ann Rowland that she and her family had no power to prevent. Life went on, but there were scars -- scars on Hispanic women's bodies and minds.
A scorned Elena left her scars, too.
Jaime Kenedeno - 04:08am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#14 of 16)
Gracida & Patrick Flores flipped pedophile back & forth to protect the "Pot of Gold"!
This was information (my research) exposed upon Ray Fernandez Request Dr Fernandez went to the Church (St Joseph's) where Father Gerry Appleby molested the Altar Boys.
The Diocese of Pensacola-Tallhassee, on October 7, 1975. Bishop Rene H. Gracida, auxiliary Bishop of Miami, was appointed by Pope Paul VI to be the founding Diocesan Bishop. This new diocese in the panhandle would be the largest geographically in the state, 14,044 square miles with the smallest Catholic population at 34,000.
Source:
http://www.stpeter.ptdiocese.org/history.html
________________________________________ THIS IS AFTER GRACIDA OF FLORES SENT HIM TO ST PETERSBURG FOR HIS ASSAULTS HERE AT ST. JOSEPH'S IN THE BODY OF CHRIST. THEY KNEW HE WAS A PEDOPHILE. ________________________________________
Upon arriving in Texas, Father Appleby went to a church in the Archdiocese of San Antonio, in the small village of Charlotte. Members of the Gonzalez family insist he has molested at least four members of their family, altar boys and other children attached to small Texas parishes.
"How dare this bishop throw him over here in Texas and not do something there. They should have prosecuted him and thrown him in jail. They could have saved so many boys lives. My sister would have never have met him," said Virginia Gonzalez-Ortiz.
Source:
http://www.28news.com/stories/archive/020517appleby.shtml
THE ABOVE LINK HAS BEEN ERASED! I WONDER WHO DID THAT?
CHURCH UNIVERSAL????
Jaime Kenedeno - 04:17am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#15 of 16)
Am I Lying?
Is this a Fantasy for you Rog?
Rog: "fantasy world of government employee eg. medical examiner, Texas Ranger, police, F.B.I. cover-ups and are in dire need of help."
Texas Rangers are involved ask Mr Roberto Garza. Ray Fernandez knows him well.
Police are involved and reports are available.
FBI ask Christopher Gale, Sam Granato and Ringo.
Cover ups are being uncovered everyday ask Mr Shamsie, Tyner ask Jorge Rangel.
Go ahead prove me wrong I dare ya!
It is gonna get RUFF.
Ask Mary Cano & John Hubert.
Ask Catherine D Unger.
Jaime Kenedeno - 04:33am Jan 2, 2006 Central (#16 of 16)
Ask Catherine D Unger.
Oh yeah I forgot......... she is dead.
An unfortunate "Accident" right Ray?
She was ivestigating what I was researching for Ray Fernandez.
I have emails to prove it.
Ray, do ya got those conversations recorded?

No comments: